SiteGround vs Cloudways 2026: Speed, Uptime Tested
February 2, 2026 by Maria
Choosing between SiteGround and Cloudways is not just a matter of price. These two platforms follow very different hosting philosophies, and the right choice depends on your technical comfort level, traffic expectations, and long‑term growth plans.
In this in‑depth comparison, we break down SiteGround vs Cloudways from a real‑world perspective—performance, pricing, features, ease of use, and who each platform is actually best for. No hype, no fluff, just practical guidance to help you make the right decision.
If you want an easy, beginner‑friendly hosting experience, SiteGround is the safer choice. If you want flexibility, dedicated resources, and better scaling, Cloudways usually wins.
SiteGround is a long-established hosting provider officially recommended by WordPress.org, known for combining ease of use with dependable performance. Its hosting portfolio includes shared hosting, managed WordPress and WooCommerce plans, and scalable cloud hosting, with much of its infrastructure built on Google Cloud.
Proven Trust and Brand Authority
SiteGround’s long history in the WordPress ecosystem and its WordPress.org endorsement make it one of the most trusted names for new and growing websites. For many users, this credibility alone is a deciding factor.
Consistent Performance for Most Use Cases
Performance is generally strong across SiteGround plans, especially for low to mid-traffic sites. It uses SSD storage (NVMe on select plans), a proprietary caching layer through the SG Optimizer plugin, and built-in CDN integration. Uptime reliability is also a strong point, with a 99.99% guarantee that suits business-critical websites.
Modern, Beginner-Friendly Control Panel
Instead of the traditional cPanel, SiteGround uses its custom Site Tools dashboard. The interface is clean, intuitive, and well-organized, making common tasks like managing domains, backups, caching, and email accessible even to non-technical users.
Responsive and Knowledgeable Support
Customer support is one of SiteGround’s standout features. Users have access to 24/7 assistance via live chat, phone, and ticketing, supported by detailed documentation and tutorials. This is particularly valuable for beginners and small teams without in-house technical expertise.
Practical Built-In Features
Most plans include free SSL certificates, daily backups, professional email hosting, collaborator access, and security features. Staging environments and advanced tools are available on higher-tier plans, making them suitable for developers and agencies managing active sites.
Higher Renewal Costs
While SiteGround’s introductory pricing is competitive, renewal rates increase significantly. This can impact long-term budgeting if users do not account for the higher ongoing cost after the first term.
Resource Constraints on Entry Plans
Lower-tier plans come with stricter limits on storage, visits, and site installations. These plans work well for small or single websites but may feel restrictive as traffic or project scope grows.
Advanced Tools Locked Behind Premium Plans
Some valuable features, such as on-demand backups, advanced caching options, and priority support, are only available on higher-priced plans, which may push growing users toward more expensive tiers.
SiteGround is best suited for:
SiteGround delivers reliable performance, excellent support, and a user-friendly experience, making it a dependable choice for many WordPress users. However, it is best evaluated with long-term costs and plan limitations in mind, especially for sites expecting steady growth.
Cloudways is a managed cloud hosting platform that acts as a layer between users and major cloud infrastructure providers such as DigitalOcean, Vultr, Linode, AWS, and Google Cloud. Instead of traditional shared hosting, Cloudways offers managed servers optimized for performance, scalability, and control, making it popular among developers, agencies, and high-traffic WordPress sites.
True Cloud Infrastructure and Scalability
Unlike shared hosting environments, Cloudways provides dedicated cloud resources. This means CPU, RAM, and storage are isolated, resulting in more predictable performance. Vertical scaling is also straightforward, allowing users to increase resources as traffic grows without migrating to a new host.
Strong Performance Stack
Cloudways uses an optimized performance stack (often referred to as ThunderStack), which typically includes NGINX, Apache, PHP-FPM, Redis, Memcached, and optional Varnish caching. Combined with SSD storage and built-in CDN integration, this setup delivers excellent load times, especially for dynamic and high-traffic WordPress sites.
Developer-Friendly Control and Flexibility
The Cloudways control panel is designed for flexibility rather than simplicity. Users can manage server-level settings, PHP versions, cron jobs, Git deployments, and application configurations without dealing directly with the cloud provider’s dashboard. This level of control is a major advantage for technical users.
Pay-As-You-Go Pricing Model
Cloudways uses monthly, usage-based pricing tied to the underlying cloud provider. There are no long-term contracts, making it easier to scale up or down based on actual needs. This model is attractive for growing businesses and seasonal traffic patterns.
Advanced Features for Growing Sites
Features such as staging environments, automated and on-demand backups, server monitoring, firewalls, and free SSL certificates are included across plans. These tools make Cloudways suitable for agencies and teams managing multiple WordPress installations.
Steeper Learning Curve for Beginners
While Cloudways is “managed,” it is not beginner-oriented in the traditional sense. Users unfamiliar with cloud concepts may find the interface and terminology overwhelming compared to shared or fully abstracted WordPress hosting platforms.
No Email Hosting
Cloudways does not provide native email hosting. Users must rely on third-party services for transactional or business email, which adds complexity and potentially additional cost.
Costs Can Increase with Scale
Although entry-level pricing is reasonable, costs can rise quickly as server resources increase or when using premium cloud providers like AWS or Google Cloud. This makes long-term cost planning important.
Support Is Technical
Cloudways support is knowledgeable and responsive, but it is more technically focused. Users looking for step-by-step guidance or beginner-level assistance may find the experience less accommodating.
Cloudways is best suited for:
Cloudways delivers powerful cloud-based performance, flexibility, and scalability that far exceed traditional shared hosting. It’s an excellent choice for performance-driven users, but it requires a higher level of technical comfort and thoughtful cost management.
Pricing is often the first thing people compare when choosing a hosting provider, but the real question isn’t just which is cheaper. It’s what you’re actually paying for and how that cost scales as your website grows.
SiteGround and Cloudways follow two very different pricing philosophies, which makes a direct dollar-to-dollar comparison misleading without proper context.

SiteGround is positioned as a budget-friendly option at the entry level. Its shared WordPress plans start at a low introductory rate, making it attractive for new websites, bloggers, and small businesses just getting started.
Even on the entry plan, users get a generous feature set: managed WordPress hosting, built-in caching, free SSL, daily backups, email hosting, and CDN integration. For small to medium traffic websites, this offers solid value at first glance.
However, the pricing picture changes after the initial term. Renewal rates increase significantly, and as traffic grows, users often need to upgrade to higher plans to avoid resource limitations. This means SiteGround is most affordable in the short term, but can become relatively expensive over time for growing sites.

Cloudways takes a different approach. Instead of shared hosting tiers, pricing is based on dedicated cloud resources from providers like DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS, and Google Cloud.
The lowest-priced plans cost more upfront than SiteGround’s shared hosting, but they include dedicated CPU, RAM, and storage. This ensures predictable performance and eliminates the resource sharing common in entry-level hosting plans.
Cloudways uses a pay-as-you-go model with no long-term contracts, which makes it easier to scale resources only when needed. While this model offers transparency, costs can increase steadily as server resources grow or when using premium cloud providers.
| Pricing Aspect | SiteGround | Cloudways |
| Intro Pricing | $2.99/mo | $11/mo |
| Renewal Pricing | $17.99+/mo | $11/mo (predictable) |
| Billing Model | Tiered contracts | Pay‑as‑you‑go |
When comparing affordability, the value depends heavily on the type of website being hosted:
Cloudways also requires fewer performance-related add-ons, while SiteGround users may eventually need plan upgrades or external services as their site grows.
When comparing hosting providers, features matter—but only when they align with how your site is built and managed. A long checklist looks impressive, but real value comes from how integrated, accessible, and usable those features actually are.
SiteGround and Cloudways take very different approaches here. One focuses on all-in-one convenience, while the other prioritizes performance control and flexibility.
| Feature | SiteGround | Cloudways |
| Free SSL | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Email Hosting | ✔️ | Add‑on |
| Server‑level caching | Limited | Advanced options (Redis, Varnish) |
| Staging | Depends on the plan | ✔️ |
| SSH/SFTP | ✖️ / ✔️ | ✔️ / ✔️ |
SiteGround is designed to reduce dependency on third-party tools. Most of its core features are included across plans, which makes day-to-day site management straightforward—especially for non-technical users.
Key strengths of SiteGround’s feature offering include:
Because these tools are tightly integrated, SiteGround works well for users who want a complete hosting environment without configuring multiple services.
Cloudways takes a more streamlined approach. Rather than bundling everything, it focuses on server performance, control, and scalability, leaving some functionality optional or external.
Notable Cloudways features include:
Cloudways is intentionally lean. Many features are optional, which gives advanced users flexibility but may require additional setup or third-party tools.
From a pure feature-count perspective, SiteGround includes more tools out of the box. Email hosting, backups, security layers, and site management features are all built in and ready to use.
Cloudways, however, provides greater control over how performance features are deployed, which benefits developers and performance-focused websites. The trade-off is complexity and, in some cases, additional cost.
Performance is one of the most critical factors when choosing a hosting provider. It directly affects user experience, search visibility, and conversion rates. A fast website keeps visitors engaged, reduces bounce rates, and aligns with Google’s Core Web Vitals—metrics that now play a measurable role in SEO.
That said, performance isn’t one-size-fits-all. Different hosting architectures deliver speed in different ways. To understand how SiteGround and Cloudways compare, it’s important to look beyond marketing claims and focus on real-world speed behavior.
To assess performance fairly, both platforms were tested under similar conditions using a WordPress setup designed to mimic a live website. A lightweight, production-ready theme with demo content was installed, and performance was measured using industry-standard tools commonly referenced for Core Web Vitals analysis.
The evaluation focused on key performance indicators such as:
These metrics collectively determine whether a site meets Google’s performance thresholds and provides a smooth browsing experience.

SiteGround’s performance benefits from a tightly integrated hosting stack built on Google Cloud infrastructure. Its server-level caching, optimized PHP handling, and SG Optimizer plugin work together to minimize response times.
Here is the quick speed summary of the results we got from the analysis:
In testing, SiteGround consistently delivered:
For shared and managed WordPress hosting, these results are impressive and demonstrate why SiteGround is often recommended for speed-sensitive business and content websites.

Cloudways approaches performance from a different angle. Instead of shared environments, it relies on dedicated cloud servers with configurable performance layers such as NGINX, PHP-FPM, Redis, and optional Varnish caching.
Here is the quick speed summary of the results we got from the analysis:
During testing, Cloudways showed:
Cloudways shines particularly well in scenarios involving higher traffic volumes or resource-heavy applications, where dedicated server resources prevent performance drops caused by neighboring sites.
| Metric | SiteGround | Cloudways |
| Average TTFB | 278 ms | 313 ms |
| Uptime | 99.9% | ~99.8% |
| Load Handling* | Moderate | Stronger under peak load |
Performance Comparison: What the Results Really Mean
In pure speed tests under controlled conditions, SiteGround often loads pages marginally faster. This is largely due to its highly optimized shared infrastructure and aggressive caching tuned for WordPress.
Cloudways, while slightly slower in initial load tests, offers greater performance headroom. Its ability to scale resources and maintain speed under traffic spikes makes it better suited for demanding workloads.
Security is not just an optional feature in web hosting—it’s a foundation. A secure WordPress hosting environment protects sensitive user data, prevents downtime, and safeguards your site’s reputation in search engines and with customers. Even a single breach can lead to traffic loss, SEO penalties, or legal issues.
Both SiteGround and Cloudways take security seriously, but they approach it in fundamentally different ways. Understanding those differences helps determine which platform aligns better with your website’s risk profile and technical needs.
SiteGround’s security model is designed for simplicity and prevention. Most protections are enabled by default, reducing the need for manual configuration and third-party plugins.
Key security highlights include:
Because these measures are integrated directly into the hosting environment, SiteGround is particularly well-suited for users who want strong security without having to manage technical configurations.
Cloudways takes a more hands-on, infrastructure-focused approach to security. Instead of a fully preconfigured environment, it provides tools that allow users to shape their own security posture.
Cloudways security features include:
This setup provides robust protection but requires a higher level of technical expertise. Security is robust, but it relies more on correct configuration and ongoing management.
SiteGround prioritizes preventive security and ease of use. Its system is ideal for small businesses, bloggers, and non-technical users who want protection handled automatically.
Cloudways focuses on server isolation and control, which makes it better suited for advanced users, developers, and high-traffic sites that require tailored security setups.
Neither platform is inherently insecure—the difference lies in how much responsibility the user carries.
SiteGround and Cloudways are both strong hosting platforms, but they are not ideal for every use case. Some website owners fall into a middle category where one feels too limited, and the other feels unnecessarily complex or expensive.
This is often the case for users who want cloud-level performance without the constraints of shared hosting or the overhead of cloud infrastructure management.
SiteGround works well for small to mid-sized websites, but it can feel restrictive as a site grows. Resource limits on shared plans, combined with rising renewal costs, may push users toward frequent upgrades. For businesses expecting consistent traffic growth, this can make long-term planning harder.
Additionally, users who need stronger workload isolation or predictable performance may eventually outgrow shared hosting environments.
Cloudways offers powerful cloud infrastructure, but it assumes a certain level of technical comfort. Tasks like server tuning, choosing cloud providers, and managing add-ons can be more than some users want to handle.
For small teams or business owners without technical support, the platform may feel like overkill—both in complexity and in cost as resources scale.

For users caught between these two extremes, platforms like Rocon take a different approach. Instead of shared hosting or raw cloud servers, Rocon uses a container-based architecture, where each WordPress site runs in its own isolated environment.
This model provides:
Rocon is often considered by users who want cloud reliability and security, but with the simplicity of managed hosting and without the operational complexity associated with cloud platforms.
This type of hosting is typically a good fit for:
When SiteGround feels limiting, and Cloudways feels too hands-on, a container-based managed WordPress platform like Rocon can offer a more balanced hosting experience.
Moving a website to a new host can feel intimidating, but careful planning ensures the process is seamless and minimizes downtime. Here’s everything you need to consider:
Before making any changes, create a complete backup of your website files, databases, and emails. Most hosts provide backup tools via cPanel, Site Tools, or FTP. For extra safety, store a copy offline or in cloud storage. This ensures you can restore your site if anything goes wrong during migration.
Many hosting providers offer free migration services or dedicated plugins. For example:
Leveraging these tools can save time, reduce errors, and ensure critical settings like permalinks, SSL certificates, and database connections are preserved.
You’ll need to transfer:
Check that all URLs, paths, and permissions are correct after transfer to avoid broken links or missing content.
You usually don’t need to move your domain registrar. Instead, update your DNS records—nameservers or A records—to point to the new host once your site is fully migrated. Consider doing this during low-traffic hours, as DNS propagation can take anywhere from a few minutes to 48 hours.
If your email is managed by your old hosting provider (rather than a third-party service like Google Workspace), plan how to migrate email accounts and data. Backup email folders, configure new accounts, and update MX records on your domain to prevent lost emails.
Before updating DNS, preview your site on the new host. Most providers offer:
Check that pages load correctly, forms work, SSL is active, and plugins or scripts function as expected.
Schedule the final DNS update during off-peak hours. Monitor the transition carefully and confirm the site is live and stable once the changes propagate globally.
After the site is live on the new host, consider:
Even with careful planning, issues may arise. Keep contact information from both your old and new hosts ready. Many hosts can assist quickly with DNS, database, or file migration problems.
A smooth migration requires thorough preparation: backing up all data, using migration tools where available, transferring files and databases carefully, testing before going live, updating DNS strategically, and monitoring performance post-migration.
Following these steps minimizes downtime and ensures your website continues running reliably on its new host.
Choosing the right hosting provider in 2026 is less about finding the best host and more about finding the host that aligns with your website’s goals, technical comfort, and growth plans. Each platform has unique strengths and trade-offs, and understanding them helps you make a confident decision.
Ultimately, the best hosting provider is the one that fits your specific requirements today while also accommodating your website’s growth in the future. By evaluating performance, features, security, and support in line with your goals, you can choose a foundation that ensures a smooth, reliable, and scalable online presence.
Independent benchmarks show Cloudways generally has a lower average TTFB (~405 ms) compared to SiteGround (~510 ms), which means Cloudways often delivers faster server response time. However, both providers perform well for most websites.
Cloudways typically records uptime close to 99.99%, slightly above SiteGround’s ~99.9% figures in long‑term tests.
SiteGround offers lower introductory pricing, but renewal costs can be significantly higher, whereas Cloudways maintains stable pricing with its pay‑as‑you‑go model.
Yes — SiteGround includes free email hosting, while Cloudways typically requires an add‑on or third‑party email solution.
Cloudways tends to be better for developers due to SSH/SFTP access, staging environments, and custom caching configurations.
Elevate your WordPress hosting with 30-day money-back guarantee, free migration, and 24/7 support.
Sign Up TodayJanuary 27, 2026
Maria
9 Min Read
January 19, 2026
William
7 Min Read
Before You Go… Get 1 Month FREE on Rocon Hosting!
Experience lightning-fast speeds
No downtime or hidden fees
Dedicated 24/7 expert support
Our team will contact you soon.
Leave a Reply